Researchers develop AI tool for better irrigation

Stanford researchers have designed an AI irrigation optimization tool that could help farmers slash water use.

The tool rapidly estimates water loss from soils due to “evapotranspiration.” This is a process involving water’s evaporation into the atmosphere and the uptake of water by plants. The new Stanford modelling tool works 100 times faster while maintaining high levels of accuracy.

The tool could dramatically reduce the time needed to devise strategic, efficient irrigation schedules that best position watering and sensing equipment across entire farms. The tool could even crunch data fast enough to adjust irrigation on the fly. The AI irrigation tool can do this in near real time, as weather conditions change.

“Evapotranspiration is a critical piece of information for designing efficient irrigation systems,” said Weiyu Li, a PhD candidate in energy science and engineering and lead author of a study describing the findings in Water Resources Research. Li is a Siebel Scholar in the class of 2023 and is currently the first and only recipient at Stanford Doerr School of Sustainability.

Overall, the research is a step forward for smart agriculture. It leverages the power of modern technologies and approaches, such as big data and the Internet of Things (IoT), to boost crop yields while conserving natural resources.

“With this study, we’re helping to deliver on the promise of smart agriculture. We want to continue sustainably feeding billions of people worldwide and preserving our planet for future generations,” said senior study author Daniel Tartakovsky, a professor of energy science and engineering who is also Li’s advisor.

Simple vertical, complex horizontal

Conventional accounting for evapotranspiration has relied on what researchers call the vertical-flow assumption. In this modelling approach, the water applied during irrigation is treated as only moving straight down into the soil. The fact that the water can (and does) flow in horizontal directions is ignored. The vertical-flow assumption has been used as a computational shortcut because smart agriculture requires significant data processing. Li said the approach is sufficient for some irrigation modelling needs, but its results can be vastly improved.

Li explained that for truly smart agriculture, mainly via “drip irrigation,” the vertical-flow assumption is inadequate. Drip irrigation involves slowly and precisely administering water to plants’ root zones where the water can be absorbed with minimal evaporative loss. Drip irrigation is primarily deployed in arid regions—across much of California, for instance. This is where conventional irrigation techniques that inundate fields lead to egregious water consumption.

Smart agriculture systems also optimize timing. They water a plant only when needed, depending on the weather and the plant’s growth stage. “Historically, irrigation has largely been divorced from the plant’s needs at a given moment,” Tartakovsky said. “Drip irrigation, informed by smart agriculture practices, bucks that trend.”

Part of the challenge of smart ag is knowing where to position moisture sensors and drippers. This tool aims to provide that guidance based on real-world and nearly real-time conditions.

Better algorithms

To develop the tool, Li and Tartakovsky turned to algorithms to improve data crunching and yield quality results. The researchers combined two algorithms for the new study: an enhanced Kalman filter and maximum likelihood estimation. The algorithms start with predictions based on available data and then reduce uncertainties based on subsequent measurements.

“We plug real data measurements of soil moisture and root water uptake into our model. It improves our understanding of the overall physical system and the algorithm’s performance,” Li said. “Our study is the first to combine this algorithmic approach and apply it to drip irrigation.”

The Stanford researchers simulated a plot of land measuring approximately 5 by 33 feet in width—roughly the equivalent of a short row of planted crops.

Using the new modelling tool, calculating a precise evapotranspiration rate for the test plot only took about 10 minutes. If an enhanced Kalman filter was used, the computational time would have run 100 times longer, or about 1,000 minutes. That chunk of time equates to nearly 17 hours and thus is not actionable for timely smart agriculture.

“In comparison, an irrigation optimization system based on our modelling tool could be responsive in near-real time to changing conditions,” Li said.

When considering optimizing the upfront design of drip irrigation systems for an entire farm, the computational time required becomes downright prohibitive.

“You can start to see why irrigation system designers have relied on the simplified vertical-flow method when faced with major installation projects,” Li said.

Looking ahead, the Stanford researchers plan to see how well their modelling tool works in real-world settings when deployed on a working farm.

“We next want to perform a ‘field’ test, literally,” Tartakovsky said. “We look forward to honing our approach further with all the variables presented by real sensors, real drippers, real crops, and real weather.”