The Silver Review set out significant changes to workforce design across the Victorian Public Service (VPS). These include reductions in executive roles, improved data on workforce composition and a new program of capability reviews. Although the government has not adopted all proposals, it has supported many of them.
These changes could affect agencies responsible for water policy and regulation, particularly in areas closely tied to public sector water jobs.
- Want more information on what Inside Water is up to? Sign up for our weekly email, landing in inboxes with the latest news.
- Do you want the magazine delivered to your letterbox? Sign up here to subscribe.
What workforce challenges did the Review identify?
The Review argued that the VPS had become too top-heavy at senior levels. It found that growth in executive roles had outpaced operational needs and that some classifications lacked clarity. It proposed reducing higher-level positions and reinvesting in junior and mid-level capability.
The Review also highlighted concerns about uneven skill distribution across departments. In technical fields, including water and environmental policy, capability gaps were identified. The Review recommended a whole-of-service approach to capability building to ensure departments could deliver high-quality regulatory and policy work.
How could capability reviews shape water policy and regulation?
A key proposal was to implement rolling capability reviews across the VPS. These reviews would examine organisational design, technical depth, decision-making processes and strategic alignment. For agencies responsible for water policy, planning and regulation, this could influence how resources are allocated and how specialised roles are supported.
Capability reviews could also highlight areas where investment in digital literacy, data systems, or scientific expertise is needed. This may affect how departments oversee issues such as catchment health, climate adaptation and infrastructure planning. In this context, public sector water jobs may evolve to require broader analytical or technological skills.
What is the government’s position on workforce reform?
The government supported reductions in executive positions and endorsed improvements in workforce data collection. It also supported the capability review program in principle. These decisions signal a shift toward a more transparent and planned approach to workforce composition.
However, the government did not support all elements of the Review. It opted for targeted adjustments rather than large-scale workforce rebalancing. For water regulators and policy teams, this means immediate changes may be limited, yet long-term expectations around capability will rise.
The government also emphasised the importance of maintaining regional presence. This aligns with earlier decisions not to restructure water corporations or CMAs. Any workforce changes will need to support, rather than dilute, the services delivered to regional communities.
What might this mean for water policy and regulatory work?
The Review’s proposals and the government’s response create a landscape where capability will be monitored more closely. Departments may be expected to show how they maintain technical depth while managing workforce costs. Teams working on water policy or regulation may therefore face stronger expectations around performance, training and role clarity.
These reforms may prompt agencies to strengthen graduate pathways, invest in internal development and modernise technical roles. Areas such as hydrology, climate analysis, infrastructure planning and regulatory compliance may experience shifting demands. The capability review program may also reshape how departments collaborate on resource sharing or joint technical initiatives.
Public sector water jobs may look different in the future. They may rely on more flexible skill sets and greater use of shared digital tools. If capability gaps persist, it could influence how effectively Victoria responds to water security pressures, environmental change and customer expectations. For now, the sector remains stable, but expectations around capability will continue to rise as reforms progress.